Is the phoenix good?

Samsara

Member!
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
5,085
Reaction score
1
Location
The Hotel California
Website
www.WarcraftForums.com
I like the AM's versatility, on one hand you have a decent pseudo-flame strike, a steroid induced rifleman, and the ability to make your mages cast more and more.
The Bm has the ever so abusable flame strike and the phoenix, otherwise he dont got much that helps out the team.

great 2nd hero though.
 

Andrew

Premium Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2003
Messages
6,032
Reaction score
1
Location
Japan
get AM first and get BM second, not very likely to get either to lvl 6 tho, try to creep A LOT and you can do it
 

QuikSilver

Forum *********
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
1,917
Reaction score
1
Location
michigan/USA
Website
Visit site
A BM is very good to have at level 5.....his level 3 flame strike is just tooo strong...This is why sometimes it is better to have him be the first hero....this is the same with the mk's storm bolt.
 

Jenny

is ....listed
Joined
May 24, 2003
Messages
4,283
Reaction score
10
BM is the worst hero in the game, I swear. Weak weak weak in 1v1 since you rarely have massed units (Like in team) Flamestrike is so easily predicted and dodged. Besides that its so easy to prevent (Stun, sleep, FOCUS FIRE) and you eliminate that and BM is once again worthless. Mountain King and Archmage rule the human heroes and always will.
 

QuikSilver

Forum *********
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
1,917
Reaction score
1
Location
michigan/USA
Website
Visit site
ummm by the time flame strike reaches level 3 the other guy will have a big army with casters....Most effetive against NE untill the dryads start comming.

BM and AM are the ultimate combo....they have the most versatility and can be used against many strats.
 
Top