The Chick thread (New rules draft)

AxL

Buggin' Out
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, Mass. USA.
This is a new rules draft for the Chick thread. I tried to cover some of the things that went wrong with the other one. So just tell me if you agree with the rules or not.

---



Props to Blizz Forums for the idea of this thread.​

___________________________________________________​

Point of this thread? Self-explanatory, but if you need a further explanation this thread is to post chicks (as in woman).

[-Rules-]

  1. NO PORN (this is a bannable offense)
    -No Frontal Nudity at ALL!
    -This also includes links on pictures and/or text.
  2. Do not spam the thread with text.
    -This means if you post you must post a picture. If you do not your post will be deleted.
  3. No ugly chicks You will know if a woman is ugly or 'alright'
    -This also includes fat chicks.
  4. Try to keep the thread at a PG-13 level
    -This means anything you would not see in a PG-13 movie, is not allowed. Exceptions may be given.
  5. No anime chicks.
    -Only real woman. If you want anime chicks make your own thread.
  6. Double posting is allowed.
    -Just make sure you have more images. This is the only thread were this is an exception.
  7. No censored porn. At All.
    -Refer to the PG-13 rule (#4)

If any of the Battle Staff feel that the picture does not belong it will be deleted without warning. Also rules be added as we see fit.


By posting in this thread you agree to all these rules.
 

AxL

Buggin' Out
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, Mass. USA.
Originally posted by Zaku
No double posting.
Double posting is fine. As long as they stay on topic. I mean whats the harm? If you guys are really that concerned about double posting look for a multi-attachment hack. Like the one BlizzF uses.
 

Korittke

Member!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
5,993
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
"No censored porn. At All. "
this is poop

" -This also includes links on pictures and/or text. "
lower life forms may not be able to understand this. youre talking about frontal nudity on sites which are links on pictures. just tell them that everything that shows the source of the pic must be censored in the pic unless the site and/or the company that produced the pic is totally free of nudity.

"Double posting is allowed. "
I think this is poop since I would expect members to upload their pics to a webhost and then directly have them in their post as many did. if someone is to post images in attachments he should only be allowed to post 1 post. it is not all that hard to find images that are already on webspace either. you just go to google and search for specific words in image search then you tick high or mid quality and you get loads of pics. you just need to copy the address of the pic in your post and wham theres your no-attachment post. if this rule must stay whatsoever it should be limited to 2 posts in a row.

and hacks well i think the admins arent capable of doing that
 

AxL

Buggin' Out
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, Mass. USA.
Reason why attachments may be better is because most likely the images they put on there server will go down and run out of bandwith. Thus leaving the thread full of Red Xs.
 

-MatriX-

R{S}T
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
3,099
Reaction score
0
Location
O <-- LOOK A CIRCLE =O
Website
www.battleforums.com
[COLOR=33DD33]Sounds good to me, as long as all the people will follow it. I think last time we had a really close call to porn, I don't completely recall but there was an argument on whether it was or not.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=004400]-[/COLOR][COLOR=006600]M[/COLOR][COLOR=008800]a[/COLOR][COLOR=00AA00]tr[/COLOR][COLOR=00CC00]i[/COLOR][COLOR=00EE00]x[/COLOR][COLOR=00FF00]-[/COLOR]​
 

Korittke

Member!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
5,993
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
"will go down and run out of bandwith"
maybe they should not use shitty ass hosting
 

-MatriX-

R{S}T
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
3,099
Reaction score
0
Location
O <-- LOOK A CIRCLE =O
Website
www.battleforums.com
[COLOR=33DD33]Or maybe we should just delete his pics and perm ban him.[/COLOR]

[COLOR=004400]-[/COLOR][COLOR=006600]M[/COLOR][COLOR=008800]a[/COLOR][COLOR=00AA00]tr[/COLOR][COLOR=00CC00]i[/COLOR][COLOR=00EE00]x[/COLOR][COLOR=00FF00]-[/COLOR]​
 

CelestialBadger

Retired Staff
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
6,792
Reaction score
18
We can't post fat chicks? What about dead ones?
 

AxL

Buggin' Out
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, Mass. USA.
Originally posted by CelestialBadger
We can't post fat chicks? What about dead ones?
I would hope if someone was going to post a picture of a dead person that common sense would come in before he did.

Galatia:I won't forgot ;)
 

Korittke

Member!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
5,993
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
Or maybe we should just delete his pics and perm ban him.
ur in the wrong thread
 

RoaCh of DisCord

Premium Member
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
6,502
Reaction score
14
Didn't stop me from doing it again ;D
 

ShaftedTwice

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
1,586
Reaction score
1
Sounds great to me. We really needed one of these. Maybe censored porn should be allowed..

ShaftedTwice
 

Jason

BattleForums Guru
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
11,073
Reaction score
2
You guys really can't get your daily fix off of kazaa can you?

Man, the whole Chick thread idea, is in itself, essentially retarded.

OMG LOOK AT HER BOOBZ!!1

OH MY GAWD PRON!!1

BANBANBANBAN!1

Retarded.
 
Top