[RELEASE] QuickBind 1.0 by Sam

[sam_the_man]

Hey everybody :loopy :loopy

 

[_CM]

~approved, have fun guys

 

[sam_the_man]

hmm im gonna put it into an install file so it can install the dependencies incase people dont have them (i.e. comdlg32.ocx).

Im on a school comp, and im getting runtime errors due to missing dependencies, so when i get home ill update.

Thanks for your patience

~Sam

 

[SweatyOgre]

Ouchies, no "approved by SweatyOgre" for me.

 

[Syk]

Hmmm i dont mean to talk cocky but is it really that hard to bind? I think its actually faster if u do it the old way

 

[Dragnskull]

not if you wanna mass bind

hey sam, nice program...im actually finding this thign kinda fun for some reason....*shrugs*

...ima be banned so soon...

 

[Syk]

Im telling you man in increadably easy to bind u just find keycode and add a zero to the number

 

[sam_the_man]

yeah this prog was initially for people that dont have any idea how to use bind. its really helpful, and easy. all the keycodes are there.

btw - you can now install this prog with all the dependencies - check the first post for more info.

Hope you all like
~Sam

 

[Trojan]

maybe im noob and dont know anything about binding!!

 

[sam_the_man]

i bet you are ... lol

whats the command you have to type to manually bind something!

exactly owned.

 

[_CM]

.bind set [keycode] [keycode repeat] [command]

like .bind set 56 56 say sam is gay

 

[Syk]

Naw its .bind set 56 560 , u must add the zero in the second one.

 

[_CM]

Naw its .bind set 56 560 , u must add the zero in the second one.

umm probably with your bind module, but not with mine :confused

 

[sam_the_man]

ayy

 

[_CM]

actually nubs its

.bind set [keycode] [returncode*] [command**]

keycode is the code of the key youre binding

*returncode is 99% of the time the same as the keycode, unless you want to
change that around which can be helpful and confusing

**command is the command youre binding. (without the period of course.)

and bind module by thohell (a.k.a. the most popular used bind,) you do NOT need to add the 0 in the return code.

kthx owned i did my hw - haha i made the module didnt I?

ha! thats what I said

ggnorepwned nubcaeks

 

[sam_the_man]

:nooob

GG? anyways everyone should use quickbind! yay for QW

im coding an interactive periodic table - haha pm me if you want a copy or wanna beta ... rofl


:lucifer

:wavey

 

[Syk]

you do NOT need to add the 0 in the return code.

kthx owned i did my hw - haha i made the module didnt I?

U might not NEED to but thats how the readme says to do it and thats how ive always done and its the correct way to do it. And sometimes the return code will be completely different than keycode having no matching numbers. The onyl way to be sure is to check the keycode/return codes in the Bind .ini. See you did your homework but i have all this in my head already, no research necessary....