OneEliteMof0
Member!
Fact is a fetus is either a human, or isn't a human. We can't play the if, and, mabie, possibly so. Because if you did you would need to say 217 hours, 51 minutes, 37 seconds or less its not human, 1 second later it is (I relize this is insane, which is what was intended.) Either it is, or it isn't. 1 month, 5 months, 9 months, 37 years. DNA structure is going to be the same. Physical stat obviously wouldn't. But your physical stat changes every day even at age 85.
Although we may see why many call it "potential" or "pre life" these can not hold up. If they did, we would have to define the exact time of potential life, than to is life. This is impossible, immoral, and unreasonable. Law on abortion needs to be changed. This is the best answer that most should see as bieng fully reasonable.
If you gave consent to having sex you should live with having the child unless that would lead to health reasons that possibly could end the mothers life.
If giving birth has potential to end the mothers life, than an abortion should be legal.
If the mother was raped, than an abortion should be an available option.
If she was under influence of anything and had sex, she should not be allowed to have an abortion unless she was drugged by another person. (IE Date rape drug/Similar case.
Basicly "Person acted in sex; nature should take its course"
========================================================
Even if you don't care about the fetus's rights or not, think of it this way: Should there be results based on actions?
(Example) You got drunk and lost $500 at casino and went back the next day wanting your money back because you were drunk. They would probably give it back no questions asked right? Wrong!
People should not be allowed to just undo their actions because it is going to cause a negative effect on their life.
If you don't like the result, stop the action.
For those of you still in huggies pull up's who are about to flame on this here is your key code
@@@@@@@@@@
@ KEY CODE @
@@@@@@@@@@
Result = Child
Action= Sex
1 + 2 = 3
If you don't want to have a "3" Stop 1, or stop 2.
========================================================
Although we may see why many call it "potential" or "pre life" these can not hold up. If they did, we would have to define the exact time of potential life, than to is life. This is impossible, immoral, and unreasonable. Law on abortion needs to be changed. This is the best answer that most should see as bieng fully reasonable.
If you gave consent to having sex you should live with having the child unless that would lead to health reasons that possibly could end the mothers life.
If giving birth has potential to end the mothers life, than an abortion should be legal.
If the mother was raped, than an abortion should be an available option.
If she was under influence of anything and had sex, she should not be allowed to have an abortion unless she was drugged by another person. (IE Date rape drug/Similar case.
Basicly "Person acted in sex; nature should take its course"
========================================================
Even if you don't care about the fetus's rights or not, think of it this way: Should there be results based on actions?
(Example) You got drunk and lost $500 at casino and went back the next day wanting your money back because you were drunk. They would probably give it back no questions asked right? Wrong!
People should not be allowed to just undo their actions because it is going to cause a negative effect on their life.
If you don't like the result, stop the action.
For those of you still in huggies pull up's who are about to flame on this here is your key code
@@@@@@@@@@
@ KEY CODE @
@@@@@@@@@@
Result = Child
Action= Sex
1 + 2 = 3
If you don't want to have a "3" Stop 1, or stop 2.
========================================================