Aragorn7
Member!
I always used to think that armor was better. But recently I have been watching replays where many other players upgrade attack first. Which is better attack or armor?
Oh yeah good one Pan, i left that bit out! so yeah!Originally posted by Pan
Yeah, but there are different armor types. hero armor takes less damage then say medium, or heavy. the numbers are but a small factor.
I would go exactly the opposite. What's the point of riflemen in an army? To do damage and bring down air, they are not going to be doing much tanking but damage. So I would upgrade the footmen armour and the riflemen attack because the mroe hits the footmen can take before they die = more attacks the riflemen can do, because they arent taking hits.Originally posted by a-day-to-bleed
i agree with thriller, in case or rifles or footies......rifles get the armor upgrade first........footies get the dmg upgrade. grunts are good meat with 1 armor already so upgrade damage sinse they will be doing pretty good damage with 1 upgrade(particularly rushing) archers=armor first........hunts= either one to me 2 armor on a hunt :| woowee.....ghoules and spiders=armor for me
Isn't it..Heavy, Light, and Unarmored armour types..?Oh yeah good one Pan, i left that bit out! so yeah!
If it says Heavy armor its good!
But i'd stick with armor then attack! The more defense the better!
Then get attack! there are
-Heavy
-Medium
-Low
By about the time you do get frenzy you'll be craving armour, without it you'll get shredded by (Possibly) Tier 1 troops but defintiely to Tier2-3 troops. Aside that creeping early with ghouls without decoy units (Carrion beetles) you'll have to frequently heal since ghouls down pretty easily. Armour is always a first choice on ghouls in my opinion since when they do get frenzy..Their attack speed is blasted up t'where loss of extra dmg won't hurt too bad.For Undead, it depends. I like using Attack for Ghouls, since Frenzy kicking in + additional damage = ouch