This game looks stupid

Discussion in 'Diablo III' started by x42bn6, Jun 29, 2008.

  1. Renzokuken

    Renzokuken Saved

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2002
    Messages:
    8,812
    Likes received:
    12
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Zanarkand
    But i like it when i hit for 2500.
     
  2. Darkmatter

    Darkmatter Battle God

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    12,994
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Palmdale
    Doubt you like it when its against yourself.

    BTW I quit D22 Two I think. Want my sorc Ranzo?
     
  3. Jenny

    Jenny is ....listed

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes received:
    10
    Trophy points:
    38
    D2 is played out and sucks. I tried playing it again after hearing the D3 announcement and I played for 1 hour before being bored to tears. It doesn't age as well as Starcraft and Warcraft. Diablo 3 will probably be the same way. Guess it's just the genre.
     
  4. caboose101188

    caboose101188 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Yeah d2 is kinda old and boring now but I used to have alot of fun playing it with my clanmates. We used to do tons of baal runs. I hope there is fun stuff to do like baal runs in diablo 3.
     
  5. electricmole

    electricmole BattleForums Addict

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    669
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    iron box peninsula
    ^ duriel tanker was pretty fun too. no one wants to tank against duriel, everybody runs.
     
  6. avatar11792

    avatar11792 BattleForums Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Altair IV, pre-nano Plague
    I wish they'd keep the Necromancer, as he was so cool and several of the Witch Doctor's spells and abnilities seemed more appropriate for the Necro.

    Plus, the Necro's cooler.
     
  7. Renzokuken

    Renzokuken Saved

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2002
    Messages:
    8,812
    Likes received:
    12
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Zanarkand
    Not really, i hardly play anyway.
     
  8. electricmole

    electricmole BattleForums Addict

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    669
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    iron box peninsula
    i think the necromancer will still be in the game although they have similar skills / spells with the witch doctor. i dont know maybe the witch doctor is the necromancer replacement because the necromancer name and idea itself is supposed to be evil or diabolic like.
     
  9. x42bn6

    x42bn6 Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2002
    Messages:
    15,150
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    London, United Kingdom
    Oh, I'm not planning on getting this game, and I doubt I'll be getting games for a while. I'm happy with games that are more about storylines and sounds rather than graphics - Warcraft III, anyone?

    The reason I'm bitching? It doesn't match previous Diablo games. I'm aware gameplay and lastability are going to be good (it's Blizzard and Diablo, after all), but it's so bright and colourful in dungeons. If I wanted bright and colourful, I'd buy the new Power Rangers DVD.*
     
  10. Wing Zero

    Wing Zero lol just as planned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2002
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes received:
    12
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Philly
    8/10. You're pretty good
     
  11. Jenny

    Jenny is ....listed

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes received:
    10
    Trophy points:
    38
    Were you seriously comparing D3 to Warcraft 3? Warcraft 3's story is good, sure, but the gameplay sucks. Heroes ruined the game to no extent. They get more and more gay with each patch. Sure, there's some near user maps but this isn't enough to sell a game. Also if I recall WC3 tooted a few whistles regarding their "gr8 gfx" when it first released.
     
  12. Mike_Zakuto

    Mike_Zakuto New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2005
    Messages:
    9
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Even if the game is still in alpha stages, hasn't the Diablo Series been about gameplay more than graphics... Actually, I think all Blizzard games have been that way, and they still make tons and tons of money because they know that its not just about graphics 100% of the time.
     
  13. Jenny

    Jenny is ....listed

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes received:
    10
    Trophy points:
    38
    I thought Starcraft, D2, Wc3, and WoW were pretty fancy graphics for the time they came out. I dunno for sure. I couldn't remember if my life depended on it. I do remember Starcraft had pretty neat graphics for its time - it was the only PC game I played at the time though so not much to compare it to.
     
  14. Johnny

    Johnny IMMERSION RUINED

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,375
    Likes received:
    1
    Trophy points:
    38
    From:
    Garden Grove, CA
    The reason Blizzard does so well is because it doesn't use top of the line graphics. They could if they want, but that would decrease the amount of people that would be able to play the games, not everyone has top of the line computers to play them. That doesn't mean the graphics aren't good either, I don't think that (at least for the time the game was released) the graphics weren't at least on par with other games, sometimes even sub-par.
     
  15. ChrisH36

    ChrisH36 Guy with Most Posts on Quiet Board.

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    15,042
    Likes received:
    4
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Temple Prime, Sarajevo
    I would have to disagree with heroes. If they were left unchecked, yes they can become gay and totally wreck any hope of winning a battle. As long as you kept them under check and prvented them from leveling, heroes were nothing more than regular units with 4 abilities. But then again, you would be the one with the "cheap heroes".

    Diablo III is still an unknown card to say the least. We would have to wait until it's released, gone through about 10 patches and see how it turns out.
     
  16. Emperor Pan I

    Emperor Pan I Respected Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2002
    Messages:
    12,653
    Likes received:
    11
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Canada
    On a competitive level, Heroes have only ever been imbalanced during ROC, up until they got a huge revamp.
     
  17. keenp1

    keenp1 Guest

    It's far too early to say whether diablo 3 will sink or swim, and we probably won't see this game on the shelves for at least another year. But I trust Blizzard's history for making high quality games without compromises.
     
  18. Carbon

    Carbon Battle God

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes received:
    2
    Trophy points:
    0
    From:
    Sanctuary
    The game is for Diablo fans and Diablo players. It's pretty much D2 revamped with more characters, items, environments. That will make D2 players 'omg'

    They aren't trying to produce some groundbreaking game.
     
  19. Krovvy

    Krovvy Retired Staff

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    3,425
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    36
    From:
    Mars
    I didn't like it initially either, but it's growing on me.
     
  20. Lucool

    Lucool BattleForums Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    Likes received:
    0
    Trophy points:
    0
    Why are everyone complaining about the graphics? I think they look just fine..