Should SC2 be 3D?

Should SC2 be 3D?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 39.5%
  • No

    Votes: 23 60.5%

  • Total voters
    38
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston
Website
Visit site
i dont think SC2 should be 3D kas i heard u cant make alot of units with it like WC2....only goes up 2 90...instead of 200...now for someone like me i like larger armies.....so i dont think SC2 should be 3D...in the long run
 

Guest

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
2
Location
New york
Website
gamerz-lounge.com
3-D but I still want 200 unit supply. If not, leave it.
 

DigitalElite

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
0
Website
fishdynastyproducts.deviantART.com
either way works. you just have to learn how to adapt to the situation. A smaller army makes the game focus more on micro of specific units. whereas a larger army makes the game focus more on micro of everything
 

Magikarp

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
3,129
Reaction score
1
As MasterVirus said, graphics cards, processors, and most hardware that games depend on will have a major boost by the time SC:2 comes out. It's difficult to judge right now, but I think it SC needs to move on to 3D. If I want classic 2D gaming, I'll play Megaman =/.
 

Wing Zero

lol just as planned
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
12,206
Reaction score
16
meh 2d i think 3d makes them look big
 

Apple

Member!
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver
Website
www.4pp13.tk
no... itd be like that weird 3d space game that was impossible... i like 2d games alot better ne way (strategy games ne way...shooting games, no)
 

Zeroth

Member!
Joined
Jan 28, 2004
Messages
728
Reaction score
0
Location
right here
hey, you makin fun of Wolfenstien3d, DOOM, DOOM II, Duke Nukem 3d, ect.???????

on topic: it should be 3d as the units can be more detailed. in 2d, you can only get so much detail, but in 3d, you can make the units better, have camera rotations, and be able to scroll in and out. I got my bit in, now i'm happy.
 

thegrim_reaper

Member!
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Location
behind you
Website
www.freewebs.com
they should make it 2 d but make it so you can rotate the camera :/ that would be really cool, but f*ck up alot o ums maps...
oh and btw 4d only exists in science, not real life and NOT video games :)
 

RyanXWing

Nothing special
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Messages
2,204
Reaction score
1
Location
Seattle, WA.
1d is impossible and we live in an over 4d world. the fourth dimension is time.

so technically a 3d video game has 4 dimensions since time passes.

Anyways I think they should just be improved 2d graphics
 

Wing Zero

lol just as planned
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
12,206
Reaction score
16
maby 3d aint so bad... i mean it would problly get some new players then old ones
 

Wing Zero

lol just as planned
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
12,206
Reaction score
16
Star Ally said:
3D sounds good but there might be lagging issues.
it depends wc3 doenst lag much on me so i doubt that will happen
 

BlueCheeseKilla

Member!
Joined
Jul 21, 2004
Messages
356
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle
Website
l33tsk83rs.vze.com
you could fake it, using pics of different sides of 3d characters or something
 

aphextwin

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
0
3d shouldnt be that bad for sc2........ look at wc3, its pwnage in 3d.... i dont think it woulda survived if it was 2d....
 

BlueCheeseKilla

Member!
Joined
Jul 21, 2004
Messages
356
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle
Website
l33tsk83rs.vze.com
yeah...i dunno, sc lags my comp anyway..but i think its my comps fault, cuz i run wc3 and diablo flawlessly... they should make a sc2, i dont wanna play ghost, im not into console games except like zelda

off topic: the new smileys are ugly
 

Biske

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
0
Location
Nineveh
Hmmm, well, yeah to an extent. I like how they did WC3, so I'd be ok with SC in that kind of 3d.
 
Top