Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny  Pointless now. You can't seem to comprehend that you rewarded him for doing stuff that has gotten me banned 3 times. |
Don't you think if I didn't comprehend it, I wouldn't have said it needs to be dealt with. Either he needs to meet his end of the agreement to cease his negative actions, or I sack him. Some of you forget I have this power.
Quote:
| I'm pretty sure everyone pretty much likes Wang, Roach, Pan, and Gally. There's a difference between likeability and being a completely douche bag. You can determine where Fagharl and Jafar belong judging by the uproar from not only me about their promotions. |
Yes I know that there is a difference. But there are times when people, although hated have some superiority. I have had to deal with that in real life: Especially at school and work. I have learned to deal with it.
Quote:
| He caused trouble from day 1. He shouldn't be a moderator it doesn't matter how limited his abilities are. The fact he gave Roach a warning for the stupidest thing just shows how childish he still is. |
I do admit he has some severity issues to work out. He tends to take things extremely seriously and literally. But that doesnt necessarily make him a bad person, just difficult to contend with at times. That was a problem we had back when he was Staff the first time. He got serious about underminded problems, made them look big, and the admins at the time couldnt stand how he was acting about them. He shouldnt have had to go all ass about it either.
Quote:
| Reporting is pointless when there are 10 members that post frequently in chit-chat. Maybe you should do your job. Or does your job only entitle making terrible decisions? |
Pointless? Are you REALLY sure about that? Reporting posts are designed to get moderators to do thier jobs. And if the reported post was about a moderator, it can be used as proof by me to show said person is in fact people are doing bad jobs, should they ask for proof.
A few of those chit chat posters are doing so, which I feel is a good thing.
Quote:
| Giving somebody -I- like and that you aren't fond of is a sorry way to make-up for that fact you're promoting solely on like/dislike. Even if Mike gets approved by Kinkarso, which I doubt he does, that doesn't mean it's a smart decision to let him moderate anything. |
Can you seriously stop implying that I have a like/dislike system going on? I told you I don't base decisions on that and all it does is have a
minor aspect in trust. If I made decisions based on that, then don't you think Battleforum's memberbase would basically be members I liked or am friends with at this moment in time? And Donny would have demoted me for being biased. If you wanted to be mod, all you need to do is prove I can trust you and you pretty much win, regardless if I hate you or not. Also, if this is the base of anyone's argument based on my decisions, then no offense, but you are ignorant and need to get that brain out of your ass.
As for that thread, it was Mike's idea, and I would be considered a jackass if he got his section made and the promotor or mod of it was somebody that WASN'T who created it. He would then rebel 50x more about how unjust that was. But I am also taking into consideration his past errors that got him kicked off AND Banned in the first place. If I didn't, then the negative aspects wouldnt have been posted there now would they?
Sponsored Links 
.
Linear Mode
