|  |
| | 
01-22-2003, 06:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| BattleForums Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Location Age: 22 Posts: 29
| Are Valks really worth using?
I mean i never seen anyone using valks never...i never use them...
__________________  | 
|  | | |  Sponsored Links
| |
01-22-2003, 09:40 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| BattleForums Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Illinois Posts: 57
| Ill use 5 for when carriers attack but then the rest is golth and wraith and seince usasally so they are good if you use them right
__________________ | |
| | |
01-22-2003, 10:08 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| BattleForums Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Location Age: 22 Posts: 29
| hahah good my foot, valks are stupid blizzard shouldn't even have thought about them
__________________ | |
| | |
01-23-2003, 07:00 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| -=[ Retired BF Adměn ]=-
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 25 Posts: 3,573
| I hope you strictly play money maps, because I don't see how you could possibly think Valks are useless. Every LT game I play, I'll always get at least 4 valks to back up about 8 wraiths in any game. Air dominance is key in expanding. Those valks can mean the difference between life or death in any TvT or TvZ game when engaged in Air to Air combat.
Don't believe me? Watch this replay. I'm not sure if I'm fend0r or coRtALoS in this replay, but I'm the top center Terran player. .gif "Wink")
__________________ NO U
 | |
| | |
01-23-2003, 07:02 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| BattleForums Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Marina, CA Age: 19 Posts: 1,403
| valks are one of the best anti-air units in the whole game. they're not the best, cause i think scrouge or devourer are better than valks
__________________
:wavey | |
| | |
01-23-2003, 07:05 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| BattleForums Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Location Age: 22 Posts: 29
| take it easy there mr.know it all, i was just trying to get a kick out of my "stupid statements"
__________________ | |
| | |
01-23-2003, 08:00 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| BattleForums Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Marina, CA Age: 19 Posts: 1,403
| you talking to me?
__________________
:wavey | |
| | |
01-23-2003, 09:03 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| -=[ Retired BF Adměn ]=-
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 25 Posts: 3,573
| Quote: Originally posted by Time4planB
take it easy there mr.know it all, i was just trying to get a kick out of my "stupid statements" | Alright, well I mean you posted a somewhat serious question in the forums considering you made a new thread on it. Just wanted to make sure anyone else reading this didn't immediately think they suck.
Yeah, they're not too effective vs Carriers or BCs, however they own most light air units and really are one of the most effective anti-air units in the game. Get 4 or 5 of them and even scourges won't touch you.
__________________ NO U
| |
| | |
01-24-2003, 06:07 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| BattleForums Addict
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: 44 Francis St Marrickville Syd Posts: 687
| valks r ok, they can be better with more dmg. Great armor though.
__________________
I would say Malaysians suck. But....*sigh* | |
| | |
01-24-2003, 07:49 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| BattleForums Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 1,328
| Valks own wraiths and mutas, so they are usefull.
__________________ | |
| | |
01-24-2003, 07:57 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| Forum Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Canada Age: 20 Posts: 12,118
| Valks, along with the green cloud thing can be setremely deadly, especialy against overlords VS zerg. | |
| | |
01-24-2003, 08:10 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| Grumpy Old Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Portugal Age: 23 Posts: 9,999
| Irradiate?
btw, valks are better than devorers, i think | |
| | |
01-24-2003, 11:54 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| BattleForums Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Marina, CA Age: 19 Posts: 1,403
| devourers suck in my opinion, but when they attack, the slower the enemy's attacks. but they still suck in my opinion.
__________________
:wavey | |
| | |
01-25-2003, 01:36 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| Grumpy Old Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Portugal Age: 23 Posts: 9,999
| ye they do...
hey Cortalos, a gg there
the enemy zerg was very good and u defeated it!! sometimes seemed impossible with those dark swarms | |
| | |
01-27-2003, 12:35 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| BattleForums Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Behimd the bushes waiting for an unsuspecting mage Age: 24 Posts: 7
| Valks are one od the best air units in the game who eve says they suck is a newb to unbelievable proportions
__________________ | |
| | |
01-27-2003, 10:19 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| lol just as planned
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Philly Posts: 12,014
| valks are very good agasnt people who bunches up thers guys like overlord for exaple some people put em all at the mineral place then people wit valks come to overlord hunt then they scwred or u can use valcks to escort drop ships
__________________ The Lost World of ThorneStar: DiabloCraft Racing: Rock N' Roll Edition CONFIRMED with Bloom and Brown
  
CLICK ON US IF U LIEK MUDKIPZ
_ ∩ 卐
( ゜∀゜)彡 Oppai! Oppai! Starcraft 2!!
⊂彡[ | |
| | |
01-27-2003, 11:34 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| Saved
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Zanarkand Age: 21 Posts: 8,316
| Unless someone micros well. Mutas & Wraiths will get eaten by Valks. | 
| | |
02-03-2003, 05:02 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| BattleForums Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Location Age: 22 Posts: 29
| Battlecruisers, Carries, and other valks get owned as well my friend..haha
__________________ | |
| | |
02-04-2003, 01:20 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| BattleForums Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 1,328
| Not carriers.
__________________ | |
| | |
02-04-2003, 02:10 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| Grumpy Old Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Portugal Age: 23 Posts: 9,999
| carriers do get owned by valks, if u aim them and not let hem fire the interceptors | |
| | | |  | | | Get rid of all these ads! Take 30 seconds to register. |
Anthem
Linear Mode
