Why does Supreme Commander look better?

[AP]

Why does Supreme Commander look better than the sequel to one of the greatest PC games ever made?

Man SC 2 should look like that but even better, right now sc2's graphics still look unrealistic and cartoony, like wc3. Unit sizes are unproportioned and a lot of other things.

[Renzokuken]

Wow, why don't you look at the pictures and realize it's not cartoony?

[Wing Zero]

i agree. i mean who cares about the low end pc users?

[m3ph1570]

no offense but supreme commander looks/looked SO ****ing gay

[Phoenix2003]

How anyone is so obsesssed over realism in PC games is something I'll never understand. *rolleyes*

[AP]

grphics are meant to look more realistic.
Thats why ppl are paying for expensive cards.

[Renzokuken]

Yeah because making a game where only high-end card users could play makes sense right?

With WoW, Blizzard didn't make the graphics insane so low-end PC users could still play. Larger playerbase = more money.

[AP]

But blizzard could easily make the units in better scale. I know its not practical for everything to be 1:1 scale but it's just stupid how a bc is the same size as like 15 marines

[Ntrik_]

Originally Posted by AP

But blizzard could easily make the units in better scale. I know its not practical for everything to be 1:1 scale but it's just stupid how a bc is the same size as like 15 marines

bc could potentially hold more than 100 men in real picture, i think the scales they have right now is alright

[DontWannaRegister!]

Originally Posted by AP

Why does Supreme Commander look better than the sequel to one of the greatest PC games ever made?

Man SC 2 should look like that but even better, right now sc2's graphics still look unrealistic and cartoony, like wc3. Unit sizes are unproportioned and a lot of other things.

You ment to say "Why does Supreme Commander look different than Starcraft 2" - and it does because they chose a different look.

And how about not having a sig which is 50 times larger then the actuall message.