Register for free, and make this box disappear!

Welcome to the BF Forums! Register Now, It's Free!


Welcome to the BF Forums; your source for the latest video game news, strategies, discussions, and resources. Join over 66,000 like-minded gamers to chat about your interests in our community.

You are currently viewing the forums as a guest user, which limits your access to certain content, contests, downloads, and more. By joining our free community, you will be able to respond in discussions/articles, contact members privately (PM), participate in regular-scheduled contests, see less advertisements, and have access to many other features. Registration is quick, easy, and completely free.



Have your questions answered. Share your thoughts about a topic. Take 2 minutes, Register Now!
BattleForums.com Forums > Other Interests > General Gaming

We're Half-Way There!! - BF Lotto: $50 Ebay or Amazon Gift Card - A Single Click is All It Takes...

View Poll Results: Third or First person shooters?
FPS you rube! 13 76.47%
TPS....duh 4 23.53%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2006, 02:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
Nicholas The Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 19
Posts: 1,300
TPS Vs. FPS

Which do all of you like more Third or Fisrt Person Shooters? (and why)

Personally i like third person because i feel like i have much more control over the character and it is much much more fun to look at, in my opinion.
__________________
.: Fun :. .: Take my quiz!! :.


_-+*^*+-_VOET FOR DIABLONESS_-+*^*+-_

Quote:
Originally Posted by IDefy
I meant offspring are created so in the future more penis sucking may occur.
Nicholas The Slide is offline   Reply With Quote
Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
Ads suck! Take 2 minutes to register for your free account, and GET RID OF THESE ADS!
Old 05-09-2006, 02:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
TheoStormhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 579
I like FPS more because I think it is more close to reality.
TheoStormhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2006, 06:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
c9h13no3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,912
Try playing any decent shooter in 3rd person, and you'll get obliterated.
__________________
I made a frag video

Games Currently Playing: None
c9h13no3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 03:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
FPS shooters are a lot closer to realism.

Note: The "Try playing any decent shooter in 3rd person, and you'll get obliterated." goes both ways.
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 09:34 PM   #5 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
Nicholas The Slide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 19
Posts: 1,300
I was referring to games like Oni, where there is no first person mode, not playing an FPS in third person.
__________________
.: Fun :. .: Take my quiz!! :.


_-+*^*+-_VOET FOR DIABLONESS_-+*^*+-_

Quote:
Originally Posted by IDefy
I meant offspring are created so in the future more penis sucking may occur.
Nicholas The Slide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 09:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
I'm talking about the perspective being closer to reality. Because let's face facts: you're not going to be viewing your character from a angle in the sky, or what have you. I actually prefer to see what my character would "see".

The joys of being untouchable.
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 11:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Administrator
 
Emperor Pan I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Posts: 12,006
Of course a game where you shoot guns, aliens, zombies communists, terrorists, republicans, teletubies are soooo much more realistice because it's first person.

Third person allows much more control and functionality with your character, and doesn't limit movement to a 35 degree cone of sight which is unbareably unusable.
Emperor Pan I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006, 12:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
Which is, sadly, what people really have. It seems you'd be a lot harder to sneak up on, which is funny since humans naturally have considerably large blind spots.

I don't see any loss of functionality. The piles of dead zombies would agree.
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006, 01:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Neolch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 15
Posts: 51
I love First Person Shooters, they give you a better aim and an easier chance to get a look on things. You don't have to worry jumping in FPSs, in a TPS when you go to jump an obstacle you may fall short seeing as you don't get the front eye view. Then again, I mostly play games that have both aspects in them, FPS and TPS.
__________________
Neolch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006, 01:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
I scare my friends when playing FPS games, by the way. I listen to "Hippie songs" about love, peace, fellowship while blowing everything away. I've taken out two friends, three bots on my own. Heavy Support FTW!
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2006, 01:40 AM   #11 (permalink)
The best of both worlds
 
SouLess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by c9h13no3
Try playing any decent shooter in 3rd person, and you'll get obliterated.
With the exception to Tom Clancy games.
__________________

Stars, Hide Your Fires!

Let Not Light See My Black And Deep Desires.

Song of the week thread! POST YOUR ****ING SONGS!
SouLess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 03:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
GoVi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: illini
Posts: 91
I love games like tombraider,kotor, and ghost recon. 3rd person perspective adds more. Only flaw i can see is the way Lara croft handles lika a cement truck when moving.
GoVi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 03:09 PM   #13 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Renzokuken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Zanarkand
Age: 21
Posts: 8,102
Third-person and shooter shouldn't be in the same sentence together. They don't work.
Renzokuken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 05:41 PM   #14 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
Thid person perspective removes a small bit right in front of you, and also quite a bit of realism. I'm with Renzo.

I also believe that shooters don't belong on the PC.
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 05:41 PM   #15 (permalink)
Forum Administrator
 
Emperor Pan I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Posts: 12,006
Third Person > First person.

end of discussion
Emperor Pan I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 07:01 PM   #16 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
How so? I really enjoy the first person perspective, particularily when shooting. The only thing close to a third person shooter that I feel is close to being legendary is "Super Smash TV". So, how are third person shooters better?
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 07:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Forum Administrator
 
Emperor Pan I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Posts: 12,006
Because I say it is.
Emperor Pan I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 08:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
Demon Overlord
 
Laharl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Age: 21
Posts: 5,000
That's some swell logic you have going, Pan.

FPS are superior for the following reasons:
1. More realistic viewpoint (You don't view the world from somebody else's perspective)
2. The player is "closer" to the action, and the "blind spots" (Yes, people have vast spots they can't see, one of which is actually right in front of us, our mind just automatically fills it with what it seems to think makes sense)
3. I just like seeing the gun as if I'm actually holding it (Kekeke).
__________________



This time I had a good time,
Ain't got time to wait.
I wanna stick around 'till I can't see straight.
Laharl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 08:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
lol just as planned
 
Wing Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philly
Posts: 11,879
i dont mind any of them
both have advantages and disadvantages

Third person- soem games have shitty camera angles but i jump better with out lookign at teh ground

FPS- bit more realistic but the arms look dumb and i hate jumping large gaps
__________________
The Lost World of ThorneStar: DiabloCraft Racing: Rock N' Roll Edition CONFIRMED with Bloom and Brown

CLICK ON US IF U LIEK MUDKIPZ


  _  ∩ 卐
( ゜∀゜)彡 Oppai! Oppai! Starcraft 2!!
  ⊂彡[
Wing Zero is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 08:43 PM   #20 (permalink)
Forum Administrator
 
Emperor Pan I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Age: 20
Posts: 12,006
Quote:
More realistic viewpoint (You don't view the world from somebody else's perspective)
Sure in your ideology it’’s more realistic. But realism sucks ass. Best video games in the world? No where near realistic. Realism blows. The more you try to make things realistic, the shittier the game becomes.

Quote:
2. The player is "closer" to the action, and the "blind spots" (Yes, people have vast spots they can't see, one of which is actually right in front of us, our mind just automatically fills it with what it seems to think makes sense)
In other words you have never played a TPS.

Quote:
3. I just like seeing the gun as if I'm actually holding it (Kekeke).
1. If your arms were a foot long and came out of your midsection.
Emperor Pan I is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Get rid of all these ads! Take 30 seconds to register.

« Garry's mod | Medieval 2: Total War »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0