Register for free, and make this box disappear!

Welcome to the BF Forums! Register Now, It's Free!


Welcome to the BF Forums; your source for the latest video game news, strategies, discussions, and resources. Join over 66,000 like-minded gamers to chat about your interests in our community.

You are currently viewing the forums as a guest user, which limits your access to certain content, contests, downloads, and more. By joining our free community, you will be able to respond in discussions/articles, contact members privately (PM), participate in regular-scheduled contests, see less advertisements, and have access to many other features. Registration is quick, easy, and completely free.



Have your questions answered. Share your thoughts about a topic. Take 2 minutes, Register Now!
BattleForums.com Forums > Diablo > Diablo 3

We're Half-Way There!! - BF Lotto: $50 Ebay or Amazon Gift Card - A Single Click is All It Takes...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2004, 09:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
BattleForums Newbie
 
AmazonDude589's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19
D3 Equipment Layout

I dont know how many of you out there have played the game called Darkstone....but i find that it has one thing that makes it better than diablo 2 in a key way. what i am talking about is that you can equip TWO Amulets and FOUR Rings.....I've talked with my friends about it and i dont know if it's just us but.....i think that the game would benefit from that. I honestly think it would be soooo much cooler if you could equip TWO Amulets and FOUR Rings......if you would like to talk further about this you can E-mail me at reddragoon990@myrealbox.com

Homework
__________________
AmazonDude589 is offline   Reply With Quote
Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
Ads suck! Take 2 minutes to register for your free account, and GET RID OF THESE ADS!
Old 04-08-2004, 12:11 AM   #2 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 25
i like the idea of more rings but two ammulets? If you have more than one you might as well have 3 or 4 or 5 its kinda a little over board scince you only have one neck. maybe you could have it so you could but a ring on each finger so that would be... .let me see... 1,2,8! That might be alittle much but you know whatever. i also think they should include some sort of legs. I mean i know they have greeves and stuff but what about thigh gaurds im sure they could include some sort of leg armor cause that would be awsome.
__________________
SirKillallott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2004, 10:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
BattleForums Newbie
 
AmazonDude589's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19
anyone else care to post?
__________________
AmazonDude589 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2004, 04:29 AM   #4 (permalink)
The best of both worlds
 
SouLess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,782
If you read the manual, it says that if you have more than one magically amulet on, it would concentrate too much energy and cause you to die. Something like that, same thing with rings. Also, most of the body armor covers the thigh area, with a few exceptions.
__________________

Stars, Hide Your Fires!

Let Not Light See My Black And Deep Desires.

Song of the week thread! POST YOUR ****ING SONGS!
SouLess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2004, 09:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
Plumpamania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Shire
Posts: 618
Yea can you imagine a Blizz sorc with 4 sojs and 2 maras....not even funny, since most have 10 CSGC's
__________________
In Plump We Trust.


SUMMIT SUXXORS
Plumpamania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2004, 12:54 AM   #6 (permalink)
BattleForums Newbie
 
AmazonDude589's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19
jake you said about the more than one amulet thing....i pulled out my d2 manual and what it said was this Too many peices of jewerly in close proximity to one another would cancel their effects out. i think thats bs
__________________
AmazonDude589 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 06:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
ZeldaMaster78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 109
lol yeah its just something they put in there to stop peaple like Amazon dude to think a bout it.
__________________
ZeldaMaster78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 08:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
iknad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: pittsburgh
Age: 22
Posts: 39
WHY do people still play d2?! it got old after the first week nothing new the same old thing

TRADES
TRADES
COWS
TRADES
COWS
__________________
iknad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2004, 08:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
iknad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: pittsburgh
Age: 22
Posts: 39
Ooo i almost forgot

TRADES
COWS
BLOODY RUNZ
MEPH RUNS
BLOODY RUNS
TRADES
DUELZZZZ!!!
__________________
iknad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2004, 08:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
Plumpamania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Shire
Posts: 618
Well we know you were a typical 1.09er that was addicted. Game has changed my friend. Like most games yes it does have the same things to do, but things change, and if you don't adapt yourself of course you're not going to have fun.
__________________
In Plump We Trust.


SUMMIT SUXXORS
Plumpamania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2004, 08:46 PM   #11 (permalink)
BattleForums Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 17
Is it even true that there is going to be a D3? or is it just rumors... And if there is going to be a d3 does anyone no around when a release date...will be here?
__________________
Oxy-cottent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2004, 08:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
Plumpamania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The Shire
Posts: 618
Think about it.

If WoW hits it big which it will. Then they turn to D3.

D3 will be like WoW but it will be obviously in the Diablo world directed for us devoted diablo fans.
__________________
In Plump We Trust.


SUMMIT SUXXORS
Plumpamania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2004, 05:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
McGorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In a house
Posts: 591
I dont like the idea of having 4 rings and two ammy's. Sure its possible, but it would make the game so much easier.

Anyway...Diablo 3 will most likely be released and it wont be an MMORPG. Blizzard's already made WoW (or are making it still) and to change diablo into a MMORPG would just stuff it up.
__________________
McGorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2004, 05:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
drax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,699
I think they're going to work on Starcraft: Ghost and Starcraft 2 before they work on Diablo 3.
__________________

buttsecks

Picture is gone now. *cry*
drax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2004, 05:26 AM   #15 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
McGorilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In a house
Posts: 591
I like the diablo layout. Anyway, Drax, diablo 3 is already being made.
__________________
McGorilla is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Get rid of all these ads! Take 30 seconds to register.

« will there ver be a D3? | Different Idea for D3 »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0