For the proud Nazis

[₪Zeratul₪]

BEMIDJI, Minn. - A troubling profile of the teenager who shot dead nine people, seven at his high school, emerged on Tuesday — one of a Native American who described himself as a "NativeNazi" and who other students said was regularly picked on for his odd behavior.

So now the news is trying to blame others for HIS shooting spree? Yeah right! So it looks that way though. I highly doubt being picked on drove him to become a neo-nazi.

Weise was also found by the St. Paul Pioneer Press newspaper to have posted several comments last year on an online forum frequented by neo-Nazis. He used the pen names Todesengel, German for "angel of death," and "NativeNazi."

Good luck kiddies with your screen names. Some are quite questionable (Pan). Although wearing flags will help single people out. I'm sure an investigation will begin soon upon forums. Not just questionable forums but all forums.

Here is the link
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7259823/

Since the Columbine-Massacre, kids with guns, video games were taken A LOT more seriously.
And now after this incident it looks like Neo-Nazis are going to get their 15 mins of fame.

So here is the debatable part, and lets not use the First Amendment to start our conversations.
This may or may not be a turning point for online, watch out liberals here comes a scary word for you...I warned you, censorship.

A new term for 2006? “NetPolice”

I know its a great look into the future, but it is possible that this might happen. Not that what we say will be censored, cutting out cuss words or having our posts deleted, but having our activity monitored by authorities. By this I mean being reported to the proper authorities for suspicious activities for the protection of others. There are plenty of people who will oppose this at all turns. While I am somewhat for NP, I know that it will be abused just like everything else is.

So, now we have NP arresting people on the net who say the wrong shit and are getting court time for conspiracy, or even planning shootings, bombings and whatnot. We were already faced with this problem in the movies. In Minority Report people were being arrested before they had even done anything. This can prove argumentative, and can be abused as we saw, preventing a crime in America now is seemingly be coming the crime itself.

I’m all for life, and if preventing a crime means arresting someone before they kill and ruin people’s lives, I’m all for it. Since Columbine zero-tolerance has been strictly enforced but of late. If you had anything that was in anyway sharp or labeled dangerous they would take it away from you and look further into the matter. Now, what will happen with this shooting? I suggested NP, but I’m sure there will be more anti-gun laws, and more “security guards” at schools. I do believe these security guards are complete jokes since they have no authority to do shit, and won’t do anything but hand out condoms.

Seeing people hurt because others have died means nothing to someone who hasn't felt the string of a loss. I sure hope that incidents like this will be prevented in the future by preempted strikes.

Another awesome movement is going to happen. Mark my words.

[CelestialBadger]

NetPolice? lol

[Homem mAIOR]

Well actually in the states with all those silly popularity contests and all, I believe that being constantly picked on must cause certain people (already pending to that) to go berserk...
Really if I spend half of my days calling you scrotum face or so you would fed up at a certain point ay??

[Gummy_Demonz]

I definatley agree with your point, just because we are forum posters and we have tags with *hypotheticaly* the Afghanistan flag, doesn't mean we are planning terrorist acts and/or purchasing weapons/WMDs. It is quite enfuriating to see anyone accuseanother because of a person's mistakes. This pointing of the finger only brings more frustration and confusion into the world by trying to ASSume the obviously unobvious answers to crimes.

If I was to enter a forums where, to the "n00b" NP, everything sounds like the exchange of weapons (e.g. CS) then the NP will make a complete jack-ass of itself by censoring/arresting/fining innocent people. This will definately lead to lawsuits by the good citizens of the world which will eventualy lead to the protest, trial, and destruction of the NP. But, who is to say that the NP will come out in 2006? Though i might be getting ahead of myself, who is to say that the NP does not exist at this very moment and are reading our posts. In fact, we might even be censored for knowing too much, like the world in George Orwell's 1986.

Though I am sympathetic to the families of the victims, I must debunk the obviously insane judgement that the internet had something to do with it. The internet is a world of its own, and actually existsas a living, breathing entity therefore no rules can apply to the internet, because it is the same exact thing as the human mind. Though eerily it seems like Minority Report, if the NP were to take these measures, it would be like having violated a severe law by merely imagining how it would be like if you were in the shoes of Tony Montana.

To anyone who sides with the "NP", I say to you this, if you like all your privacyto be taken away from you and having your boss find out that you were on a Zoo Porn website thus leading to your termination from your position, go ahead, support all you like. Also, if you want, in the neer future, to have your brain scanned at the airport thus leading to a delay or arrest because you were fantasising about the hot person next to you, by all means have fun with your secret friends in the middle of NowHere.

[₪Zeratul₪]

Originally Posted by Homem mAIOR

Well actually in the states with all those silly popularity contests and all, I believe that being constantly picked on must cause certain people (already pending to that) to go berserk...
Really if I spend half of my days calling you scrotum face or so you would fed up at a certain point ay??

I've been bullied before to the point of snapping. This one kid was in my face and provoked me too far. I punched him in the gut. He stopped, and he lives today. I didn't shoot him, nor did I go to his school with gunS and murder him and anyone that passed by.

Originally Posted by Gummy_Demonz

To anyone who sides with the "NP", I say to you this, if you like all your privacyto be taken away from you and having your boss find out that you were on a Zoo Porn website thus leading to your termination from your position, go ahead, support all you like. Also, if you want, in the neer future, to have your brain scanned at the airport thus leading to a delay or arrest because you were fantasising about the hot person next to you, by all means have fun with your secret friends in the middle of NowHere.

Its not having privacy taken away from you, its monitoring what is happening.
Zoo-pr0n, as sick as it is, isn't illegal thus one wouldn't go to jail for it.
If you got fired for watching zoo-pr0n its one) not doing your job and watching zoo-pr0n. two) its probably against job policy, and thats why you got fired. It was your choice to watch it, no one elses.

Why would there be delays or even arrests in airports for thinking of hot women?
You could argue rights are already taken because they scan your bags. These are safety messures for everyone in the airport and on the plane. Should we get ride of these scanners just because some perv doesn't want people to find out of his macabre doings? I say no, scan them and if they have weapons arrest and question them.

Okay, so Mr. Joe John goes to the airport and is asked to open his baggage to find that its full of sex toys. If he gets embarrassed thats his problem for being a sickie, not the airports. Maybe people shouldn't be perverts if they are scared of getting caught.

[Gummy_Demonz]

I meant my previous post to be symbolic of the extremes that could quite possibly exist if this monitoring was to go on.
In the airport case, it is attemptive sexual harrassment if you are caught fantasising. With the porn case, the man looks at this stuff at his own house but seeing as how anything can get you fired these days, his boss may be a woman and object to the material and fire him for being a sicko though he is probably the most efficient person at the company.
these are just random extreme case scenarios an i only meant it symbolicaly to stressa point to where monitoring privacy could lead to.

[Static]

Him being a Nazi has nothing to do with the shooting. It was his undieing love for the cack which drove him to voilence.

[Snagg]

the only people who support NP are people who don't use the internet.

[₪Zeratul₪]

That is very untrue! People who support the idea of NP probably don't watch zoo-pr0n or do illegal activities that would get them arrested or pay fines.

[Magikarp]

One day the Net Police are going to come and take me away.

[l33t 0n3]

If you look at his home life and such, theres no reason why he shouldn't be a nazi. He went to nazi websites as an outlet, I would guess.

[Homem mAIOR]

You can't judge a person by the websites he goes to... I mean look at us then
But I think that being constantly picked on is a reason to go berserk!

[Gummy_Demonz]

Originally Posted by Homem mAIOR

You can't judge a person by the websites he goes to... I mean look at us then
But I think that being constantly picked on is a reason to go berserk!

yup, thats why we see so many people going postal down in the USPS place.

[DaRk_rEvEnAnT]

guns are really too easy to come by in this country. oh well.

i think ill go baby animal hunting now. =D

[Homem mAIOR]

Well I don't think that free proliferation of guns is the main cause for this to happend but it sure gives a boost...

[Azurio]

A bit off topic but one of our global teachers bought his house from 2 gay nazis. He said the place was horrid and had holes in walls.

Waist down holes. :umm

[Ashigaru]

Nazis? Here? Never.

[Laharl]

Come here Ashigaru, let me **** you... Let me suck you... Let me violate you, mr. Nazi.