Register for free, and make this box disappear!

Welcome to the BF Forums! Register Now, It's Free!


Welcome to the BF Forums; your source for the latest video game news, strategies, discussions, and resources. Join over 66,000 like-minded gamers to chat about your interests in our community.

You are currently viewing the forums as a guest user, which limits your access to certain content, contests, downloads, and more. By joining our free community, you will be able to respond in discussions/articles, contact members privately (PM), participate in regular-scheduled contests, see less advertisements, and have access to many other features. Registration is quick, easy, and completely free.



Have your questions answered. Share your thoughts about a topic. Take 2 minutes, Register Now!
BattleForums.com Forums > General > The Arcane Sanctuary

We're Half-Way There!! - BF Lotto: $50 Ebay or Amazon Gift Card - A Single Click is All It Takes...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2004, 08:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
BattleForums Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: College
Posts: 516
Limiting medical malpractice lawsuits

Incremental lawsuit award caps would be a start towards dropping cost of healthcare without a quality drop. The reason for this is that when there is no cap like in Illinois the cost of malpractice insurance skyrockets. In Illinois it is around $200,000 per year, next door in it's Indiana $20,000 per year. This money doesn't come from nowhere, and doctors can't always afford to pay for it so they have to join a big hospital that pays for it. So the price of healthcare is passed on to the consumer. In Illinois this is an extra $180,000 per doctor spread out amongst the patients. Male gynecologists, and brain surgeons are becoming very scarce in Illinois!

The best solution would be incremental caps though. For instance there would be a set limit for losing your hand and you could even set a list of things that would decrease this limit for any particular person. If the hand was already badly damaged to the point that any recovery was unlikely for example when they went into the hospital for example they maximum amount would be again cut.
You could also limit the amount a person could sue for in risky but necessary operations. For example someone with a brain injury who needs difficult surgery that has a good chance of dying wouldn't have their family be able to sue for much if they die.

This may seem unfair to the people suing, but it's even more unfair for people that end up with lower quality doctors when the good ones leave the state.

what do you people think about this issue?
__________________
To be is to be flawed.
To live is to decay.
There is a strange comfort from the thought that I won’t be here forever.
Gedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Beitrag Sponsored Links

__________________
Ads suck! Take 2 minutes to register for your free account, and GET RID OF THESE ADS!
Old 11-18-2004, 04:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 230
They should be limited as doctors are trying to help and shouldnt be held responsible for little things
__________________
XenoDancer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Get rid of all these ads! Take 30 seconds to register.

« British Columbia Minister Threatens Trade War with US | One of the best Republican scams »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:34 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0