Military Technology discussion

[Biske]

Originally Posted by Iliaran

just another piece of US technology:

http://www.battelle.org/navy/railguns.pdf

That is awesome. Can anyone say "Metal Gear Solid"?

[Korittke]

M1A1 > T-95. You ask for a source? Computer games. I rely on them. Take Desert Combat. Just from that game i can tell you (from what I remember)

Abrams: better range, worse armor, turret 360 turnable, quicker, lighter, more versatile, more beautiful

[Kuzmich]

Originally Posted by Korittke

M1A1 > T-95. You ask for a source? Computer games. I rely on them. Take Desert Combat. Just from that game i can tell you (from what I remember)

Abrams: better range, worse armor, turret 360 turnable, quicker, lighter, more versatile, more beautiful

Games arent reliable sources, especially american games. They are too biased, T-95 been called best tank in the world.

[Ashigaru]

Originally Posted by Kuzmich

Games arent reliable sources, especially american games. They are too biased, T-95 been called best tank in the world.

So anything that says Russia isnt the best is biased...?

[Kuzmich]

No, but games are not reliable sources especially american games. If there has been an actualy test made that prooves that Abrams tank is better then T-95 then that info is not biased. But such test has been made and it prooved that T-95 is better then the american alternative.