Quote:
Originally Posted by Sakuhta  Ron Paul is an imbecile.
And big spending has nothing to do with neo-conservatism or extreme liberalism, contrary to popular ignorant belief. Before Bill Clinton there hadn't been a surplus, let alone balanced budget in 30 years. It is another one of the pitiful ways of politics, it's not George Bush's egotism. George Bush and the presidential economic council created a balanced budget, it's congress that drafted the $390 billion deficit we have. |
Hi, Kuzmich here, lots of things seem to have changed around battleforums in the time I was gone, but obviously not the idiocy of some people. Where is hard, factual documented evidence of an economic surplus during Clinton era, I can show you a chart if you want it, the economy started going down because Bush took office. I really don't understand this, why would anyone want to make up foolish, non existent excuses for a man like Bush who basically ruined your country? Deficit ay? How about that 9 trillion dollar debt? No one trust Bush anymore and where are plenty of reasons not too, he lies to the public with no strings attached, he got US into a pointless war, he violated the privacy law, his people corrupted the justice department. The only thing worse then Bush is the Congress that has no balls to impeach him...but moving on. Ron Paul seems to be a genuine guy and that is obvious that he is not getting elected because of it. Barack Obama seems to be the best bid for US stability in the next year's elections, you may call him naive but hell, so far all the "experts' been doing is screwing things up, a new approach should be welcomed. In any case compared to Bush everyone is a genius, the guy opens his mouth and the lack of intellect just pours out.
Heute
Sponsored Links 
Linear Mode
