Welcome to the BF Forums! Register Now, It's Free!

Welcome to the BF Forums; your source for the latest and greatest video game news, strategies, discussions, and resources. Join over 60,000 like-minded gamers from around the world to chat about your interests in our community.

You are currently viewing the forums as a guest user, which limits your access to certain content, contests, downloads, and more. By joining our free community, you will be able to respond in discussions/articles, contact members privately (PM), participate in regular-scheduled contests, see less advertisements, and have access to many other features. Registration is quick, easy, and completely free.

Have your questions answered. Share your thoughts about a topic. Take 2 minutes, Register Now!
BattleForums.com Forums > General > The Arcane Sanctuary

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2006, 04:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Respected Member
 
Tipsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Washington D.C
Posts: 1,313
Joining a Global Community

The basic question is, are you in favor of your country, whatever country it might be, joining or creating an organization that would put more binding influence from an international consensus on your country.

What this basically means is would you want your country to be a member of a United Nations type organization that has teeth (and would purposively be more effective because of this change). The thing is, for this to ever happen it would require nations to give up some of their sovereignty and would allow an international consensus to put regulations on all member states.

I'll expand on it later, but I wouldn't be willing to give up any sovereignty to join this sort of organization.
__________________
Tipsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 04:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Aya Matsuura is awesome
 
x42bn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Age: 20
Posts: 14,906
If the entire board was impartial (i.e. United Nations minus Security Council and minus veto), then yes, I would allow it. The only bias is during a vote, where that country has more say.

I would love a voting system like the Eurovision Song Contest, too, where citizens vote... But that is utopia. *
__________________
* Hang on a second...

Diablo III has been announced!

Here's what you need to do: Register a new account and tell the world what you think of this game.

Tell the damned world. The world wants to know.
x42bn6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 07:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Care-ifornia
Age: 22
Posts: 2,054
It would be nice but I doubt it would ever happen. The United States and China like having all the power in this world and won't give up the United Nations anytime soon.
Lizardbreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 08:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
Tempest Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redneck, Texas
Age: 20
Posts: 1,819
No. I simply don't trust delegates, citizens, and leaders of foreign nations to have our best interests at heart.

We let anyone in the UN. Dictators, democracies, republics, theocracies, ect, ect. There is no common consensus. No common values that all countries share. No common rights.

Besides, democracies and republics eventually turn into dictatorships anyway, a world democracy would be no different, considering the amount of idiots, religious zealots, supersticious morons, and despotic power mongers out there who can easily be manipulated by someone smart and calculating enough.
__________________
MSN-max758@hotmail.com
AIM-masey209, ICQ-99.
Yahoo IM-masey209, tavric209@yahoo.com
For image hosting, click here
__________________________________________________

The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance. - Socrates
God created man in his own image. And man, being a gentleman, returned the favor.[/i]
Tempest Storm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Arxces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 211
I think it would be much better if the international organisation existed to regulate only international issues, not intra-national ones. This way power won't be taken from the nation's people for self-determination, but the people's power to determine the fates of other nations would be limited.
__________________
"By Time,
Indeed Mankind is at a loss,
Except those who believe, and do righteous deeds, and exhort one another to Truth, and exhort one another to patience."


"Al-Asr" Verses 1-3
Arxces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 04:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
B~E
BattleForums Senior Member
 
B~E's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Montreal, in a ghost town.
Age: 23
Posts: 2,415
I'd supporte a North Atlantic regional organisation, regarding issues who are not covered by NATO, such as economy, immigration and culture.
B~E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 12:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
BattleForums Senior Member
 
Tempest Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redneck, Texas
Age: 20
Posts: 1,819
I'm not down for a North American version of the Euro Union. America and Canada, fine lands respectively, but with different cultures, would only breed discontentment and resentment if the other were allowed say in the others domestic affairs.

You be telling us to raise our taxes, nationalize our health care, get rid of our guns, and we'ld be telling you to outlaw pot, let your people own full automatic 50 caliber machine guns, hike up the price on your pills, and purge Quebec of all the "Frenchies". I don't see it getting much farther past that until the invasion of the mounties begin, and we're forced to nuke your vast permafrost fields washing you aaaallllll away.
__________________
MSN-max758@hotmail.com
AIM-masey209, ICQ-99.
Yahoo IM-masey209, tavric209@yahoo.com
For image hosting, click here
__________________________________________________

The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance. - Socrates
God created man in his own image. And man, being a gentleman, returned the favor.[/i]
Tempest Storm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 12:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 60
re

Most of the UN is made up of dictators. I want my country (USA) to remain sovereign.
KCspdracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 01:58 AM   #9 (permalink)
BattleForums Member
 
Гражданин СССР's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 329
Im against it, naturally, sovereignty is all that a nation really has, the most valuable resource. If you give up your sovereignty you give up your national identity plus the advertised benefits are scarce at best. Poor get poorer, rich get richer in this types of organizations and there is no way around that.
__________________



ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ ПРОФЕССИЯ РОДИНУ ОТ МУТАНТОВ ЗАЩИЩАТЬ
Гражданин СССР is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 04:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
The great Emperor
 
AZN_FLEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hideout
Posts: 1,206
can someone explain what this is all about? sovereignity, and what tipsy said. i sense searching this up on google wont help much.

to get the general gist of the topic...the more you have to lose, the less willing you will be. poor desperate countries might want to join global communities where your "sovereignity" is taken away to receive as much help as you can. although this is highly unliekly because the people at the top of piss poor countries are usually corrupt and power hungry.

my 2cents
AZN_FLEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
BattleForums Member
 
Гражданин СССР's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 329
Also lets take WTO for example, Mexico joined WTO to improve its struggling economy, its economy only got worse. Foreign companies from rich countries like US came in, bought everything and now get piss cheap labor for products that are barely taxed than going over the border. People in Mexico are stuck in hopeless jobs that don't pay them enough to survive, almost slave labor, yet capitalism flourishes.
__________________



ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ ПРОФЕССИЯ РОДИНУ ОТ МУТАНТОВ ЗАЩИЩАТЬ
Гражданин СССР is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 04:04 AM   #12 (permalink)
The great Emperor
 
AZN_FLEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hideout
Posts: 1,206
hmmm thats a very good example you have.

what i think is that, its not the mexicans fault, it is the countries that are exploiting it.

what i meant earlier was that it is easier to lose sovereignity if you are a piss poor country. joining a community that takes sovereignity but offers protection will seem like a better alternative than to being wiped out by another state or country, or maybe even civil war. if any of these cases occur, the country is more or less destroyed anyway.

i dont believe in losing identity and am a strong believer in a moral and honorable life. i think that keeping soveriegnity is important but soemtimes there may be times when you have to give it up for the good of your country. i dont have any examples of this but the expression "**** happens" sums up what i just said nicely.

im really sleepy right now, dont destory me if i contradict myself.
AZN_FLEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 10:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
BattleForums Member
 
Гражданин СССР's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 329
Well once again look at my example, Mexico gave up part of its sovereignty to the WTO and was only hurt by it.
__________________



ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ ПРОФЕССИЯ РОДИНУ ОТ МУТАНТОВ ЗАЩИЩАТЬ
Гражданин СССР is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 09:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Undead Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 233
It isn't practical in today's world, at least democratically. Why should Chinese or Indian values have more say than mine do while we're in my corner of the world?
__________________
Undead Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 11:44 AM   #15 (permalink)
BattleForums Member
 
Гражданин СССР's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undead Cheese View Post
It isn't practical in today's world, at least democratically. Why should Chinese or Indian values have more say than mine do while we're in my corner of the world?
Agreed, even the European Union that theoretically is composed of nations with very similar values is yet to have all or even a majority of its member states ratify a single European constitution that failed to pass in 2005. National pride and national identity will always get in the way of this and similar notions.
__________________



ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ ПРОФЕССИЯ РОДИНУ ОТ МУТАНТОВ ЗАЩИЩАТЬ
Гражданин СССР is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 02:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
BattleForums Junior Member
 
dArKmIsChIeF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Illinois
Age: 18
Posts: 187
i agree...
btw how do u remember ure name CCCP?
__________________
dArKmIsChIeF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 04:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
BattleForums Member
 
Гражданин СССР's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 329
Im Kuzmich, but I've been CCCP for a while even before I left for many, many months (a year?).
__________________



ПОТОМУ ЧТО ЕСТЬ ТАКАЯ ПРОФЕССИЯ РОДИНУ ОТ МУТАНТОВ ЗАЩИЩАТЬ
Гражданин СССР is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« The Abortion Thread (now with nifty rules!) | Civil War »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 | Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0