Death to Arabs.

[Schizophrenic]

Kill these beard having bastards. Take their land, rape their women, and feast on their resources. To the Americans this would be thought as a terrible thing but where is the trouble.

For starters The United States does not undertake in the whole Conquer scene. We are a helpping people with care in the mind and scandal in the books. We shall overcome this obstacle of gas prices and come out on top like always.

Why wait? You guys have the power to just charge the Middle East and take their land one by one by one by one. What is the problem if other countries think it as wrong. You take out one problem and solve numberous troubles, all rooting from those sand dwellers.

Taking over the arab lands will insue other problems with other countries.

Tell me, which problems will it bring out that can't be dealt with.

Other countries could see us doing this and then build up on military bracing for an attack on thier land.

What would other countries have to fear the US for. They aren't bombing cities, they aren't over charging us for oil, they aren't killing the jews. All bull**** that the US can weed out but are afraid to do.

[Lights]

You overestimate America's strength. Sure, we could bomb the whole place, killing everything and everyone, but that would be stupid. I really don't think we have the military power to take out the entire Middle East through conventional warfare. We have our fuggin hands full with Iraq.


But, erm, not that I think it should be done. It's actually an incredibly stupid idea.

[Schizophrenic]

Convential warfare. . . Who needs it. Send in the best of the Seals on one side of the middle east and Tanks, Airforce, Privates on the other. It is the US' bitch side that doesn't allow this to happen.

Iraq problem? That is the problem that would be taken care of by invading and taking over the middle east.

We kill the rebels and leave the land half drained of its oil as war reperations and then let their government take care of it.

He makes a blunt yet clear point.

[Cobalt Wolf]

I want you to know that the women in their country get disrespected
enough as it is without your help. They get raped in their own homes
and cannot do/say anything about it. I wish you were a woman
- yes, I'm actually cursing you.

[Hot Action Akule]

I think i get a say in this, as my dad and countless people i've met through him are over IN iraq and i know of ONE who has been shot and saved by his kevlar multiple times.

No, there is no need for any senseless slaughter of anyone anywhere. It'd be stupid to think so and really, [EDITED OUT].

Originally Posted by Schizophrenic

Convential warfare. . . Who needs it. Send in the best of the Seals on one side of the middle east and Tanks, Airforce, Privates on the other. It is the US' bitch side that doesn't allow this to happen.

Iraq problem? That is the problem that would be taken care of by invading and taking over the middle east.

We kill the rebels and leave the land half drained of its oil as war reperations and then let their government take care of it.

He makes a blunt yet clear point.

If we attempted to do this, and send in our "seals" on one side (They're called NAVY seals for a reason [EDITED OUT]) IN THE ****ING DESERT and just wiped through the land with tanks the airforce and the marines (Not "privates' [EDITED OUT]. ) for one thing the entire world would uproar against the american war machine, we'd have a complete world wide war going on against us and it'd tear us up and yes we would eventually lose. With the majority of the world against us, we will lose.

================
Please refrain from flaming in the Arcane Sanctuary.
-Tipsy

[Schizophrenic]

Navy Seals, yes. So you tell me that a Navy Seal will never step foot off a boat? Possibly into a jungle, snowlands, from the air. Navy Seals are used wherever their stealth and special skills are needed.

Thats right [EDITED OUT]. How is a world wide war different from what we have now? They have attacked us, and our allies. Back in the 40's no one would of stood for this ****. [EDITED OUT] all you are little [EDITED OUT - I believe the the word 'scared' would fit in better here] when it comes to war.

Men have been killing each other for thousands of years. Just because we can walk down the street holding a jiggaboo's hand and wear miniskirts doesn't mean we still can't kill for other reasons then to resolve violence.

============================
Please refrain from flaming in the Arcane Sanctuary.
-Tipsy

[x42bn6]

If the Middle East was a superpower, would a stupid idea like this come out of their mouths, saying Death to Americans?

Plenty of Middle Eastern and Asian people are innocent. You cannot kill all of them just because there are a bunch of terrorists amongst them. I could say the same thing about American hooligans.*

[Bret]

Originally Posted by cRaPtaLoS

for one thing the entire world would uproar against the american war machine

The world already is, even way back when. They fear us, and they want to dismantle our army. Even former President Clinton screwed the military over during his eight years. I remember watching plenty 20/20 and 60 Minutes (these were/are great shows) talking about military personal not having to support their little families (wife and child) little alone themselves.

Originally Posted by cRaPtaLoS

we'd have a complete world wide war going on against us and it'd tear us up and yes we would eventually lose. With the majority of the world against us, we will lose.

There are only a few countries that I'd be worried about that would be against us. Otherwise most of the world is pretty poor and could care less about what the US does. They'd all be fighting each other as well for land and resources.

Originally Posted by Schizophrenic

Navy Seals, yes. So you tell me that a Navy Seal will never step foot off a boat? Possibly into a jungle, snowlands, from the air. Navy Seals are used wherever their stealth and special skills are needed.

Navy SEALS are the leet. They can and DO anything. They go anywhere and are machines while doing their job. Its sickening to think about it.

Originally Posted by Schizophrenic

Thats right [EDITED OUT]. How is a world wide war different from what we have now? They have attacked us, and our allies. Back in the 40's no one would of stood for this ****. [EDITED OUT] all you are little [EDITED OUT - I believe the the word 'scared' would fit in better here] when it comes to war.

Yea, things change. In the 40's killing babies was called killing babies. Now its just called planned parenthood.

Originally Posted by x42bn6

Plenty of Middle Eastern and Asian people are innocent. You cannot kill all of them just because there are a bunch of terrorists amongst them. I could say the same thing about American hooligans.

I agree, there are a lot of bad people in some countries. But there are also a lot of good people. So then what? We weed through them even if that means "lossing" your freedoms. Or some would have it, "privacy". You can't play a game of chess not looking at the opponents pieces even if you have all the good moves.