Thread: WWIII Scenario
View Single Post
Old 08-19-2004, 11:10 AM   #126 (permalink)
vanilla_ice_cream
BattleForums Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 151
Agrees: 0
Agreed with 0 times
Quote:
Originally posted by Lights
Americans did not win the war by themselves, any fool that thinks that is a... fool. However, neither di the USSR win the war by themselves.

As for who had the greatest influence to the end of the war? Well, Normandy (Which wasnt just Americans, though most) and the Atomic bombs did a LOT towards the end of the war, causing a sooner end. Not that just those two events completely balanced the hundreds of skirmishes and battles the USSR fought with Germany, but it did end the war sooner. So... that can go either way, but it is still a stupid arguement. The ALLIES won the war, not a single country.

And Hitler was a TERRIBLE military commander, absolutely terrible. Anything he planned or coordinated was a horrible failure. His ideas were pathetic.



That is true, China has the worlds largest standing army; i.e. they have the most manpower. However, they are not the most technologically advanced military, but they are getting more advanced quickly. Thought I'd clear that up.




As for WWIII, I believe it will either start in the Far East or Middle East, so it will definantly start from some place in Asia. It could be becuase of Korea's nukes or the middle eastern oil, I dunno. :\
Well I'm glad someone agrees with me that Hitler was a horrible Military commander. He helped the allies more than he helped Germany. America is the most technologically advanced country with the most advanced military, but then again when you look at Iraq, well...... Let's just put it this way, if WW3 broke out, once again this is assuming if ground troops are used, I wouldn't want Geroge Bush at the helm.

China can be a formidable threat if they were more technologically advanced. They have a whole lot of people in there.
__________________
vanilla_ice_cream is offline   Reply With Quote