Quote:
Originally Posted by x42bn6  You misunderstand me. Diablo II has been out for ages and if Blizzard were to forcefully take over that website, they would alienate customers. But in today's age of technology, the first thing they would like is a good URL for people to remember - hey, how about diablo3.com?
As for not signing diablo492.com, that would sort of give it away, wouldn't it? It's no secret Diablo III is being produced and it's no secret it's not going to be any time soon.* |
actually "if" its being produced, its IS a secret
a good url for people to remember? how about blizzard.com? or what about battle.net? they already have "Good websites for people to remember"
the only true logical reason to obtain a website named after a sequel they have no connection with, is because they plan to have a connection with it. Buying it just to buy it? i dont think so. This is a buiseness, everything a business does is strategic