Quote:
Originally Posted by Condestavel Sorry mate, but there is an huge difference between the volcano kind of pollution, that is actually harmful for earth only in very rare ocasions, and the constant pollution caused by mankind. The last one is by far deadlier.
Why, you ask? Because, altough the volcanoes are able to send to the atmosphere a huge ammount of dust and poisonous gases, the entire fitosphere (not sure that's how you say it in anglais, as ever, but I mean the plant world) is actually able to recicle it all.
But when you get constant pollution, AND you're also cutting down that vegetal world, it will not help anything.
As for the Ice Ages, that has to do with the position of the Earth, rather than anything else (there was a small Ice Age in the middle of the second millenia of our age), but this doesn't help it.
The greenhouse effect exists, it's there, but it's not yet as serious as people want it to be. However, it still needs to be fixed, and you americans are not doing it at all. |
when i said the greenhouse effect doesnt exist i didnt mean it literally. there has always been a greenhouse effect on earth. however, it has not been getting any stronger in the recent years. its all myth and stupidity of that shit scum al gore.
as for the volcano thing, i didnt know about that lawl.
if you cant be stuffed going on youtube ill say this for him: the extra heat on the earth is obtained from our cities and heat absorbing material e.g metallic buildings and shit. these things hold the heat inside the earth and keep it in there instead of letting it go. so every year the total heat of the earth increases.
this explains why some areas get warmer while other areas dont have as much change in temperature. if you notice, it is usually the urban areas that get warmer and the rural areas where there isnt much change in temp. the slight increase in temp is brought on by the urban areas exerting heat.
the ave temp of the earth started increases in the early 1800s IE the idustrial revolution, where buildings made of steel or whatever were being built. i dont believe this is just coincidence, its accurate enough. the heat absorbing material could easily have been mistaken for the gas emissions from the factories.
and as ive said, the pollution is still no where near the amount that is significant to the balance of nature or that bullshit. the heat absorption of the buildings are.
ps, we need to crucify al gore. i dont know which party hes in but we really need to pass up on his vote and NOT VOITE FOR HIM. we must keep him out of the political scene until he comes up with realistic solutions to US agenda.