Quote:
Originally Posted by Totally Spy  Ive played some FFA games and 50:50 win: losses so i know what it takes to win and how you lose. If waiting to make 3 expands and mass or being killed by 2 is skill 'ok'. But it's a fact that i havent seen a FFA with top players and by top i mean those who we see in articles and not a level 40 azeroth player who you may call so. Sorry but solo shows more skill than ffa. Even though i have had games in which i beat 3 players in ffa out of 4 but that doesnt make me proud when the opponents obviously sucked. So solo > ffa. |
The reason you don't see pros in FFA games is two reasons. You can't spam wins in a FFA match. They are long, and take a lot more from a player than a solo match would. Also whereas the top solo players (lets say 20) where to regularly play games against each other, you end up with the best players winning a majority of their games agianst the less than better pro players. If they were to play FFa games, you would get several pro players in one game, and the chance of winning drops, so the chance of losing rises, and thats all that people seem to care about. So in a Solo game your chance of winning is higher.
Also FFA is a differnet style of game. You say low skill players just mass one unit and win. I have yet to lose to a mass unit player, even mass chims. If you are good enough, you don't lose against the lower skilled palyers, because you control the game.