Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipsy  I think the authority (as in those with power) should always be questioned, however in a respectful and peaceful manner. Even if you agree with the stance, questioning a position will raise open public debate which is essential for any country to be free. What I emphasize is open debate. If you question an authority by shouting them down while trying to speak you hinder open discussion. I am not suggesting that you shouldn't protest, but if don't push it to where the other side cannot actually respond turning the situation to where only one side can be heard.
For #1, I would have to say it does hurt interaction with authority figures. You can respect a person while despising their position and not even liking the person - that should be understood by our generation. Respect, requiring disipline, is neccesary to interact with authority figures and correct or ammend their ways if you disagree with them.
For #2, I wouldn't say a lack of disicipline hinders interaction, it just changes the way in which you interact. |
I agree with what you say. However, concerning the interraction between our generation and authority, yes the interraction changes, but more importantly it does so in a way that inhibits communication. Forgive me, for not clarifying this sooner, but it is the communication that suffers. For example, when in Congress, one party filibusters the other instead of debating in a valid manner. Similarly, a rebellious son/daughter may interract with their parent by shouting and arguing, and this form of interraction is, arguably, less communicative. The important point is that different forms of interractions lead to different degrees of communication.
As for Flea's comments on the media and society, they are well justified, despite my reservations on his use of generalisations. It is disappointing to see society devolve in such a way.