Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EEX_ca_aok What I'm saying is you can "assume" LHS=RHS, but you cannot use that as a form of proof because it's an assumption, not a fact. It's a circular argument if you prove LHS=RHS by assuming LHS=RHS. That's like I could say I can prove George Bush is the anti-christ by assuming that as true.
Oh, and the square root of 1000 is 10√10, or roughly 31.6. |
Yeah, I know that. But it's not what you said. Sorry, I just felt like being annoying.
It's funny how many people think it's 100. Funny, yet sad.