| Ugh... speaker two is an utter moron when it comes to making an argument. He uses nothing but ad hominem fallacies and makes points simply by reiterating what has already been said and introducing new (but weak and scant) points to the argument.
Someone in my English class is writing a research paper on the subject of macs versus PCs. His paper seems thoroughly researched, yet his argument seemed to be based off Apple's lack of hardware and software support. |