BattleForums.com Blizzard Gaming Forums - View Single Post

EEX_ca_aok · 05-09-2006, 01:21 AM

What I'm saying is you can "assume" LHS=RHS, but you cannot use that as a form of proof because it's an assumption, not a fact. It's a circular argument if you prove LHS=RHS by assuming LHS=RHS. That's like I could say I can prove George Bush is the anti-christ by assuming that as true.

Oh, and the square root of 1000 is 10√10, or roughly 31.6.

05-09-2006, 01:21 AM	#9 (permalink)
EEX_ca_aok Praetoris Maximus Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: London, Ontario Age: 19 Posts: 2,537	What I'm saying is you can "assume" LHS=RHS, but you cannot use that as a form of proof because it's an assumption, not a fact. It's a circular argument if you prove LHS=RHS by assuming LHS=RHS. That's like I could say I can prove George Bush is the anti-christ by assuming that as true. Oh, and the square root of 1000 is 10√10, or roughly 31.6. __________________ Last edited by EEX_ca_aok; 05-09-2006 at 01:24 AM.